化石講場-Fossils Board 
» 遊客:  註冊 | 登錄 | 會員 | 幫助

RSS 訂閱當前論壇  


上一主題 下一主題
     
標題: 獸腳亞目恐龍可能同鳥臀目恐龍屬於同一個目  
 
Dinosaurprince (Dinosaur Prince)
[魚類] 中級會員
Rank: 3Rank: 3


研究員勳章   創意勳章   演講勳章   傑出會員勳章   出席勳章  
UID 3198
精華 2
積分 295
帖子 219
閱讀權限 50
註冊 2008-2-5
來自 Hong Kong
狀態 離線
[廣告]:
獸腳亞目恐龍可能同鳥臀目恐龍屬於同一個目

Hey guys, it is time to rewrite what we know about dinosaur taxonomy now
these two days we have a potential huge change in dinosaur classification in American biology that may change the traditional dinosaur taxonomy completely: theropods and ornithischian dinosaurs are possibly belong to the same clade, ornithoscelida dinosaurs, while the primitive herrerasaurida dinosaurs and sauropods remains to the sauropod clade. As a result, tyrannosaurus rex may be closer to triceratops than titanosaurus instead of vice versa as the traditional thought.  


http://www.iflscience.com/plants ... et-a-major-rewrite/


附件: [nature] nature21700.pdf (2017-3-24 02:39 PM, 2.48 M)
該附件被下載次數 75
2017-3-24 02:39 PM#1
查看資料  發短消息  頂部
 
trump
[三葉蟲] 註冊會員
Rank: 2


演講勳章   傑出會員勳章   出席勳章  
UID 31411
精華 0
積分 118
帖子 138
閱讀權限 30
註冊 2013-5-8
狀態 離線
[廣告]:
盤骨分類法錯了?

會不會根本就不應該分什麼龍盤目或鳥盤目,所有都是一家的
2017-3-24 06:38 PM#2
查看資料  發短消息  頂部
 
fossilshk (Lung)
管理員
Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9


研究員勳章   版主勳章   貢獻勳章   創意勳章   演講勳章   管理員勳章   榮譽勳章   出席勳章  
UID 1
精華 13
積分 3404
帖子 2178
閱讀權限 200
註冊 2006-7-14
來自 中國/香港
狀態 在線
[廣告]:
一向都覺得恐龍傳統分類好有問題, 是時候來一個大革新



2017-3-24 08:24 PM#3
查看資料  訪問主頁  發短消息  頂部
 
Dinosaurprince (Dinosaur Prince)
[魚類] 中級會員
Rank: 3Rank: 3


研究員勳章   創意勳章   演講勳章   傑出會員勳章   出席勳章  
UID 3198
精華 2
積分 295
帖子 219
閱讀權限 50
註冊 2008-2-5
來自 Hong Kong
狀態 離線
[廣告]:
回復 #2 trump 的帖子

All saurischia and ornithsichia belong the same family (dinosauria), that the whole clade actually seperate from other dinosaurmorpha and ornithodiran such as pterasaurus and eucoelophysis in the mid-triassic in evolution. So technically, they are in the same family. Now we just want to see if theropods are sister group of ornithischia while theropods and sauropods are cousins in contrast to the traditional view.
2017-3-25 06:56 AM#4
查看資料  發短消息  頂部
 
Dinosaurprince (Dinosaur Prince)
[魚類] 中級會員
Rank: 3Rank: 3


研究員勳章   創意勳章   演講勳章   傑出會員勳章   出席勳章  
UID 3198
精華 2
積分 295
帖子 219
閱讀權限 50
註冊 2008-2-5
來自 Hong Kong
狀態 離線
[廣告]:
回復 #3 fossilshk 的帖子

Actually there are lots of flaws in the traditional taxonomy especially classification based on single or two anatomical or morphological features. As some of those features can be results of convergent evolution. Recent molecular analysis of different animals such as earthworm and insect as well as eagle and falcon had shown that those animal are not really relate to each other as previous through. Unfortunately it may be hard to build similar phylogeny trees unless we have more dinosaur protein and DNA sequences found in fossil record otherwise protein and DNA record from the only surviving group of dinosaurs (theropods) and the scarce sample of T. rex and Triceratops protein may be insufficent to build the phylogenetic tree across the dinosaur taxa
2017-3-25 07:06 AM#5
查看資料  發短消息  頂部
     


  可打印版本 | 推薦給朋友 | 訂閱主題 | 收藏主題  


 


{支持化石講場客戶廣告, 謝謝!}


{香港首個古生物化石網站 - 化石專賣/籌辦展覽/教育推廣/復原工作}
恐龍@化石工作室 Dinosaur @ Fossil Lab



本论坛支付平台由支付宝提供
携手打造安全诚信的交易社区   Powered by Discuz! 4.1.0  © 2001-2006 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.005210 second(s), 7 queries

所有時間為 GMT+8, 現在時間是 2017-12-13 12:18 AM 清除 Cookies - 聯繫我們 - www.fossilshk.com - Archiver - WAP